What we do, how to get in touch, the work of the Authority and our rangers, plans and policies, jobs and volunteering opportunities.
Living in...
Our special qualities, the nature, historic environment and landscape of the National Park, publications, latest news, facts & figures and our education service.
Things to do, places to stay, getting active, being a green visitor and finding out more through our National Park Centres, Museum and Information Points.
Farmers at Hawes Auction Mart

Discussion board


The conference generated discussion ont a number of topics that delegates may wish to continue to debate over coming weeks.  We've set up a discussion forum to facilitate these debates.  Click on the link below to sign up to take part in these discussions.  You'll need to click on the 'Register' button, agree to the terms and conditions and fill out some registration information before you can view the discussions.

Compromises and Opportunities - discussion forum (link opens in new window)

Please note that this feature is hosted by the Association of National Park Authorities discussion forum; for staff, members and friends of the National Parks on the UK National Parks website - www.nationalparks.gov.uk (link opens in new window).

The renewable energy forum is moderated by Moya Turrell, Sustainable Development Officer at the Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority and it will be available for a period of six weeks following the conference.

If you'd like to download a summary of the discussions, please click on the link below:

To view PDFs you will need Acrobat Reader. Download Acrobat Reader (opens in new window)

Here is a list of the topics under discussion on the forum:

Compromises topics

  • Should we oppose, in principle, those technologies which have an adverse impact on the landscape but encourage less intrusive alternatives? For example, should we oppose wind and solar in favour of biomass, super insulation, sustainable design? How far should we compromise?
  • Should we oppose, in principle, those technologies which have an adverse impact on historic buildings and their setting but encourage less intrusive alternatives? For example should we oppose wind and solar in favour of biomass? How far should we compromise? Do you agree with the approach taken at Gibson Mill?
  • Should we encourage collective renewable energy projects and oppose smaller scale projects? Should we compromise in favour of a few large scale developments to avoid the cumulative impact of many small scale (domestic) developments?  For example should we encourage village or estate wind turbines rather than a cluster of many small turbines?
  • Should we accept/encourage more micro renewable schemes in order to strengthen our position on macro schemes (wind farms) on our borders?

Opportunities topics

  • Which technologies are suitable for sensitive landscapes and historic buildings? What design solutions are available and how can the impact of intrusive technologies be mitigated? eg. should turbines be freestanding or mounted on buildings? Should we resist solar panels on prominent roof slopes in favour of ground mounted systems?
  • Can the innovative designs, technologies and materials used in landmark ‘eco-buildings’ be adapted for use in traditional vernacular or historic buildings?
  • How can we proactively encourage the community to take up renewable energy technologies whilst delivering the message that the special qualities of the landscape and historic buildings should be protected?
  • What tools and resources do we need to enable us to ensure that renewable energy developments do not harm protected landscapes and historic buildings?
onload="SetDateTimeDropDown()"